Donna Maree Hanson, Author, Phd in Creative Writing

This series of interviews on the use of beta readers in the development of manuscripts for publication has been interesting and informative. While the range of usage of beta readers is varied, it is heartening to see that published authors also need input into their manuscripts as well as the new, unpublished novel writers.

For new writers, it is worthwhile to note that those more experienced novelists find critique useful in the writing process. It is also important to understand that accepting feedback on our work is part of learning the craft. To be able to take frank and fair feedback and look at your work dispassionately, is essential for growth as a writer. Few of us, I think, are amazing geniuses whose first act of putting pen to paper reveals a masterpiece. It has taken me quite a few years to realise that. (I knew I wasn’t a genius but it took me a while to figure out there are people who can just create something fantastic with seeming little effort.)

More established writers find that there are other challenges awaiting them such as looming deadlines and the continual time poor situation that creates. Writers who have deadlines and publishing schedules (and all the other things like family, friends and events to go to) do not have the same amount of time to sit on their manuscript and ponder various aspects of the story, characters and narrative as they did when they were trying to get published. For example, I began writing Dragon Wine in 2005 and while I have not consistently worked on it I have had seven years to think about it.

Experience grows with each publication and it is heartening to know that the humble reader can contribute something to the creative process as well as assist the writer to make the manuscript the best it can be in the short time available. For example, both Glenda Larke and D.B. Jackson mentioned that they did not use beta readers as much in their early careers but are finding them more essential at their careers develop. Also, other writers such as Margo Lanagan, Maxine McArthur, Tansy Rayner Roberts, Marianne De Pierres and Richard Harland have benefited from a consistent and professional approach to critiquing each other’s work through their ROR group over many years.

As a writer myself, I find receiving critique useful on many levels. For example, my big, gaping need to know if my story is working on some level and then to find out what’s not working so I can think of ways to fix it. Sometimes, talking to people about a story can identify a problem, which can lead to a raft of ideas to improve the story. Like many of the writers interviewed said— they were happy to hear what the issue might be, but don’t necessarily told how to fix it. Also writing is a very solitary occupation and when unpublished provides all too few rewards or acknowledgements. Feedback in this respect can work as a stopgap, a sort of pat on the back when hearing the good things and reminder that you have more work to do on hearing the bits that aren’t working so well. If you think about it, writers write stories to share and to provide enjoying to their readers generally (well some write to scare the bejesus out of them). So having someone read your work is sharing the work and finding out they enjoyed it can imbue one with an inner glow. I was chatting to Glenda Larke recently after I sent her some feedback. I really didn’t have too much to say, just a few thoughts and feelings, but she said she welcomed them because it helped her make the story the best it can be.

Personally, I found Ian McHugh’s interview as a beta reader very informative (as I thought I would)  and I borrowed some of his ideas for my most recent feedback on a novel I was beta reading.

As part of the wrap up, I would also like to thank the writers who gave freely of their time to answer the questions.

I hope this series of blog interviews on beta readers has been useful and as interesting to you as I have found it. The feedback I have received has been positive in this regard. I will have to put my thinking cap on about other interesting blogs. I have a couple of author interviews in mind so we will see.

Warning. The bulk of this post was dictated. I try to make sure there are no glaring errors but sometimes they slip my guard.

Ian McHugh is an accomplished writer, winning the Writers of the Future award. As well as selling short stories to professional and semi-professional publications, he is also is very generous in sharing his experience and writing insights with others. He is a key figure in the Canberra Speculative Fiction Guild and basically a really good guy.  He is currently coordinating the CSFG novel critiquing group, among other things. I wanted to interview him because we had beta read the same novel and his comments were extremely insightful so I thought his views would be helpful to writers and those thinking of using beta readers or becoming a beta reader. Ian McHugh keeps a blog here.

1. What do you see as the key role for a beta reader?

To help the author find the problems and potential in their book that they’re too close to see for themselves, and to affirm the strengths in their writing and storytelling (that they may or may not be aware of, or entirely convinced of).

 2. What are the types of things you look for when beta reader?

I tend to structure my feedback under a number of headings:

– Plot and structure

– Characters and relationships

– Conflict, tension and threat

– Worldbuilding

– Writing Style

(We’re using these headings in the CSFG novel crit group this year, and it seems to have been useful.)

I tend not to go looking for particular stuff to write under each header. I wait to see what stands out – eg, an aspect of the world that I find implausible, a character I don’t find sympathetic, a plot device that I think is too obvious. Or, of course, a character I think is awesome, an action sequence that kicks arse, a well-executed plot revelation etc.

Often I find that it’s the apparent absences, rather than what’s there, that most catch my attention – eg, a lack of tension at a certain point, an undeveloped relationship between two characters, no obvious protagonist.

I find that structuring my crits under headings helps me to organise my thoughts, although a lot of comments cut across the different sections, too – a lack of strong plot direction and lack of a protagonist go together, unsympathetic characters undermine tension.

Yeah, characters affect pretty much everything, actually.

I also jot down my reactions while reading, particularly to anything that jolts me out of the story, and provide these as well in a line-by-line list.

 3. What is the most difficult part of providing feedback when beta reading?

A) Tempering my inclination to be a smart-arse when saying something uncomplimentary about someone’s manuscript, and expressing myself purely constructively and with sensitivity to their feelings instead.

It’s a lifelong battle and I don’t win every skirmish.

B) The other most difficult part is, when I see and am excited by (what I think is) unrealised potential in some aspect of a story, staying on the right side of the fine line between (i) offering constructive suggestions in case they spark something for the author, and (ii) re-writing their story for them. So:

GOOD: I think there could be some more tension when the ranger and the barbarian go into the dragon’s cave, for example, if you draw out the uncertainty more over whether the dragon is asleep or awake, or the dragon isn’t where they expect it to be and it’s stalking them instead.

BAD: Oo, oo, instead of the ranger and the barbarian going into the cave to slay a dragon, it should totally be a horde of goblins with two or three cave trolls instead. Really huge cave trolls that ate the dragon. That’d be awesome. And the ranger should die. Awesome.

 4. What is the best part about providing feedback when beta reading?

A) Reading a story that is already awesome, and having that to say to the author.

B) When one of my suggestions makes lightning in the author’s brain, and excites them about their next draft.

 5. As a beta reader what benefit do you get in providing critique?

Accumulating reciprocal novel-reading favours.

6. Is beta reading useful to you as a writer?

I think that in getting your work critted, you tend to learn what you need to do to fix that particular story. Whereas, when you’re critically reading someone else’s work, and thinking hard to figure out exactly what it is that seems like it’s not working and why, you’re learning about writing and storytelling generally. So, fingers crossed, critting is making me a better writer.

Ian thanks for that. An excellent perspective to help tie up the series. I find I’m in accord with most of what you say. I have something to learn about structuring my feedback and I will take on board some of your approaches.

Donna

Kaaron Warren and I go way back. Kaaron has published over 70 short stories in about 20 years, has had three novels and three short story collections published. She is renowned for her horror writing, but if you read all of her work you will realise that she is a versatile writer able to write across many genres. Personally, I’m in awe of her ability to think and write outside the square and placing a very unique stamp on her work. You can find out more about Kaaron here.

1. How many beta readers do you have and how long have you used beta readers in your writing process?

I’ve used beta readers for as long as I’ve been writing stories. I wrote a novel at 14 and handed it out to trusted friends for feedback! These days, I have three or four readers for longer pieces, and often only one for a shorter piece.

2. In what ways do beta readers assist you in developing your novel for publication?

They identify plot flaws. Let you know if characters resonate with them. Tell you the logic flaws and the gaps in your research. Make suggestions for improvements in plot, naming and pacing.

3. Do all your beta readers pick up the same points?

Sometimes they do, and if so you know you probably should listen to them. Other times, they pick up small things, and rarely replicate these. I think this is because we all have different experiences in life, and we have different levels of knowledge as well.

4. Do you sometimes target your beta readers to particular areas based on the experience you had with them in the past? For example, one reader is good at plot holes, another reader is good at grammatical issues and another might be good at style. Or do you take what comes?

I take what comes. My three main readers are honest and direct, and none of them are writers. I look to them purely for the readers’ opinion and I think this works very well for me. They are all three instinctive story-tellers, though, because they will identify issues any long-term writer would pick up.

5. Do you always want the same thing from the beta reader for each novel? For example, when you have deadlines and only have time for high-level feedback?

Often they’ll see a very early draft, before deadlines are looming too hard. This helps me identify issues early in the piece, rather than later when the panic starts to hit

6. How hard is it to find a good beta reader?

It’s tricky. You have to respect the person’s opinion, and they have to have the time to give it to you! Not everyone agrees on what makes a good story, so you need to keep trying until you find someone who will give their opinion without trying to change what you’re doing.

7. Do you have any advice for readers who want to be beta readers or even editors in the long run? For example, what type of commentary to you prefer?

Be honest and direct, but not cruel. I hate sarcastic comments in the margins!

If it occurs to you, note it down, but with a question mark if you’re not sure.

Don’t try to take over the story, or change it to the way you would have written it, unless the story falls very badly and you can clearly see where it should feel. Keep yourself out of it.

If you really love something, make a note. There have been times these little notes have sustained me through the next draft, and they are an indicator of what works.

Thank you Kaaron for responding to the questions.