Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Sue Bursztynski has featured a guest blog post by me on her review site The Great Raven. This is in celebration of the release of the anthology Mystic Resonance published by Specusphere.

It is really nice of Sue to host posts from all the contributors so keep an eye out for a series of posts.It is interesting hearing how ideas became stories and then became published.

Enjoy
Here it is

You can purchase the anthology here. at the specusphere.com site.

It’s been a while since I blogged. This seems to be a phrase that I say all too often and I apologise that. Once back from the writing retreat, I’ve been up to my neck in work but also wrestling with RSI. This not only involves tennis elbow (mouse elbow), but aching wrists and a very sore shoulder. Is somewhat restricts my activities on the computer, and requires treatment by a physiotherapist. It affects how I use the computer at work and how I use the computer at home.

I must admit, with regards to the dictation software, I haven’t progressed very far at all. I think the software is fine for dictating things like this blog or an e-mail as these are fairly straightforward. But the fiction it’s going to be quite a leap for me. One of my pet hates is how the dictation software mishears me when I say stop and writes will stop. I daresay things will improve with practice but I find dictating fiction a rather tedious and difficult process. It’s so much faster to write the damn thing. ( I used to be able to write 1500 words in a hour when I was drafting)

On the other hand, even though I bought a trackball mouse, my hands and wrists and shoulder get sore with use. I’ve upped the RAM but it’s not quite enough so I’m going to have to replace the processor on this computer or buy new one. It’s not quite a sunny outlook, when you think that you may never be able to type in the way that used to, or even for the next few months. It’s quite frustrating and the novelty of the dictation software fades when the reality sets in. It’s no panacea for a disability. By the way the auto formatting in this program sucks. I feel like sitting here and saying a lot of very bad words.

I’m probably feeling a little bit morbid. On Sunday, I did an edit my story, which is going to appear in ‘Damnation and Dames’ and it took me quite a while (as it was detailed) and I did it by hand. Now I’m at the process of accepting and rejecting changes, which involves a lot of mouse work and even with a trackball mouse, it is causing pain and I’m taking a rest by dictating this blog. So in the meantime, I’m reading and studying English grammar at university. However, now that stress at work has lessened to some extent I have had lots of ideas coming through for stories I want to write. However, I have to pace myself and be patient. Lah! I find being patient one of the hardest things.

This morning I got up a little bit earlier and completed my readthrough of Dragon Wine. Now I’m going to experiment with Dragon naturally speaking to see whether I can implement the tweaks that I highlighted in my readthrough.

I was quite surprised that they were not as many typos is as I expected. However, there were a few interesting ones. For example, ‘giggling’ curls instead of ‘jigging ‘curls. That one was interesting and it would not have been picked up through spellcheck. Only the readthrough would have had the potential to pick it up. So I’ll leave you now with this very small update while I attempt dictate my way through my very long manuscript.

I expect another blog post later either crowing in triumph or seriously venting.

I forgot to add.

Here is the page for Damnation and Dames, with very sexy cover art over at the publisher’s website.

Here

You’ll notice they have opened submissions for Bloodstones. I have to put on my thinking cap for that one.

Then I should say that I added, my son, Taamati Te Rata, who is a 3D artist, who worked on games such as Medieval Total War to my links. Check out his site.

When I get a novel published, I have made him swear a blood oath to do a book trailer for me.

It’s been a long time since I blogged so I thought I’d give you a bit of an update. Firstly we got back from New Zealand and the writers’ retreat on 21 January and very quickly were back into the home and work thing. Because I had RSI, I couldn’t apply myself as seriously and as diligently as I normally would have at a writers’ retreat. However, I did get some serious thinking done on Emerald Fire, which will lay a very good foundation for writing the conclusion to the Jemima Hardcastle novel I commenced last year, Ruby Heart. (It’s a duology for the current story line). I did do a bit of drafting, but I couldn’t seriously say it was a decent first draft, except say the first two chapters. I do feel more comfortable though that I know how to deal with the baddie and how it all comes out in the end.

Since I been home I’ve been working on a hardcopy version of Dragon Wine, doing a very thorough read through and some fine-tuning edits. Given the amount of cutback and changes I have made I just wanted to give it one more go over before I sent it off. This process is taking me a little bit longer than I thought it would, because I still have a lot of fatigue and I fall asleep a lot.

In publishing news my story “Through these eyes I see” will be out soon in the Mystic Resonance by Specusphere. Below is a link to a very cool book trailer. It is a bit scary, but my name is on the front cover. I have not headlined before.

Book trailer

As I have RSI, I have not been on the computer very much at all. So today I did a little bit of catching up on e-mails. I have invested in dictation software, Dragon, NaturallySpeaking, which is working out quite well. It will take a little bit of work for me to learn to dictate (write as I think) for novel writing and short story writing. However I’m pretty determined because the RSI thing is going to be with me forever and I have to manage it. I really want it to work.

I also found out that I have another story coming out later this year in Damnation and Dames from Ticonderoga Publications. I’m very excited about this one because I love the setting and the characters. It is a 1920s noir story set in Chicago, called ‘Sangue De Notte’. It is a sister story to ‘Turning the Blood’, in Winds of Change by CSFG Publications. ‘Turning the Blood’ deals with Alf’s transformation. ‘Sangue De Notte’ happens a bit later in Alf’s life, where he meets the daring young Dela Luxman .

As for other submissions I’ve had no news as yet and I need to keep submitting stories if I’m going to get them published. Today I heard that an article I did on ‘Navigating the Slushpile’ was published by W. Q Magazine, which is put out by the Queensland Writers Centre.

I’ve dived into the slush pile again . A different manuscript in a different slush pile, but will have to wait and see . I haven’t heard anything yet .

I’m still on the writers’ retreat. Yesterday we went on an outing so not much achieved then, just 1000 words. Today, I’m not quite at 1000 words yet. Even though I am keen, it is difficult to stay focused. I know I have issues with my hands so I need to take regular breaks. Then because I have set no goals (I’m always setting word count goals) the retreat has a bit of a holiday feel to it. Also, I find I’m still tired, which is strange given I’m sleeping well. I guess it takes time to recover from months of overwork and then a massive Christmas.

So we did some blog posts with photos over here at fantasywritersonretreat.wordpress.com

Retreat. We must retreat! Here I am in New Zealand, way up in the north, in sunny (today) Keri Keri. The property is about 10 acres and has its very own waterfall. The lovely owners are dear friends, Kylie Seluka and Russell Kirkpatrick and we are here with other writers working on novels and other writing projects. It is such a luxury to go away and be free to write. I haven’t got up to speed yet but the next 14 days will give me plenty of scope to explore ideas and characters and plots. Last year I wrote 80,000 words, basically a first draft of a novel. This year I hope to work on the sequel.

Anyway here is a short post from the retreat blog.
Here.

Day two

I started with 167 200 words in Dragon Wine. I’m now below 130 000 words. Wohoo! As a reminder, I had feedback from an editor, the lovely Marco, who had seen Dragon Wine but didn’t pick it up. I was lucky enough to chat with him about it. The crucial point—it needed cutting back, particularly the story should be about what happens and not how the characters got there.

I learned a few things along the way and I thought these may be useful to some of you.

I started writing Dragon Wine in 2004, originally as a short story. However, it didn’t work as a short story. No one seemed to get the point of it. However, I got lovely feedback about it. At this time, Varuna were running the HarperCollins MS development awards. I had about 25 000 words down so I sent them in. To my surprise I made the long list. I thought ‘wow’ this might be good. The next year the awards came again. I wrote a bit more and sent it in. I made the long list again. I recall telling Peter Bishop that Dragon Wine was written because of the encouragement I received from being long-listed.

I only wrote when the competition was looming. At that time, I was putting together the Australian Speculative Fiction: A genre overview, editing The Grinding House by Kaaron Warren and running an SF convention. I think, also, my relationship was rocky and I was working as well as growing grapes. I don’t seem to do things by halves.

The point of this reminiscing is to say that at the time I didn’t know why it was good. I didn’t know how to make it better. All I knew was that I had cracked something I’d been trying to crack for years. I went on to be short-listed in the Varuna MS Development awards, but not chosen. I also won a longlines fellowship and had 2 weeks at Varuna to work on my MS. In the weeks prior to that retreat, I wrote my car off, broke my thumb in the accident, broke my relationship (I didn’t see the other car but I had a long look at my life). I had been a second or two from being annihilated. However, despite the turmoil, I had a good two weeks and revised the MS. Back in the day, my author friends were writing door stopper fantasies so I was aiming for that length. Things have changed.

Now it is nearly 2012, and I know so much more about writing. The submissions reading for Angry Robot gave me great insights. Not looking at the MS for a well over a year, nearly two, also gave me a sense of distance and objectivity. The editing course as well. (there are some key commas missing in my ms). Another key factor is that publishers are looking for shorter books, particularly from first-time novelists.

So what did I learn?
There had to be a reason for what I was writing, a reason for the scene. World-building is not enough. I found I wrote scenes to give me a chance to showcase the world. When I asked the question what is happening here, how important is it? I found that it wasn’t necessary or could be covered elsewhere. Snip!

The bridging scenes showing how some characters went from here to there. Nothing really happens. Not what is promised in any case. Just some adventure, some character exploration and zip. Snip.

Verbose descriptions. I took way too long to say things. I came back through and could literally delete every second sentence, sometimes whole paragraphs. Snip!

Dialogue that was way too polite and detailed for an action scene where people were running for their lives. Snip. Rewritten to short, half-finished sentences in keeping with the scene.

Bad guy’s point of view shots, which had been written during a revision. Snip! Amazingly this didn’t affect the story line. (This is because I added them much later and the story already worked).

Way too much thinking and repetitive examination of issues by some characters. (They were annoying me). Snip!

At times, too much description of landscapes and items. Still kept some for flavour, but could see where it was too overdone.

That might seem like a small list, but you know it is a good list. One thing does concern me. The feedback I got at Varuna was that there was a lovely pace to the story. I’ve hacked that to bits now. I’m doing a read through, highlighting things to polish. The pace is different now. Faster, leaner.

I like the feel of it now. The story is still the same. I’ve tinkered with the plot slightly but for the better. I’m amazed at how much I took out and it is still the same story. I cut over 37 000 words from it.

The process took a lot longer than it should have. That’s life getting in the way. My hands are in bad shape from writing a report at work for a few months. I have swelling in my elbow and achy hands. I am only managing to write this blog before I go away on a writers’ retreat to New Zealand. I haven’t set myself goals on the retreat, because I don’t know if I can type day after day. I have a few more days while we tour NZ before starting the retreat to rest my hands. I’m hoping it will be enough.
Anyhow we’ll be blogging here fantasywritersonretreat.wordpress.com
Come along and catch up with our antics in Keri Keri. Participating are Kylie Seluka, Russell Kirkpatrick, Matthew Farrer, Nicole Murphy, Ian McHugh and Trudi Canavan (for a week), along with Paul who is not writing.

I am pleased to present you with an interview with Russell B Farr, from Ticonderoga Publications, which has been in print since 1996. So Ticonderoga has published 25 titles, with a focus on SF, fantasy, horror, dark fantasy, paranormal romance, and related genres. With Ticonderoga Russell has published, single-author short story collections, multiple-author anthologies, The Year’s Best Australian Fantasy & Horror anthology series. Russell says he is currently looking for genre novels.
Ticonderoga Publications can be found here.

Why did you become an editor?

RF: It seemed like a good idea at the time. Seriously. I was fortunate to be hanging around with the Eidolon editors Jeremy G Byrne, Jonathan Strahan, and Richard Scriven. I saw the great work they were doing and how essential they were to the genre in Australia at the time. In the mid 1990s, Eidolon were the quality flagship for short genre fiction in Australia. This coincided with me finding myself bringing out Howard Waldrop as a convention guest. Jonathan suggested that I could do a chapbook as Howard had very little in print in Australia at the time. Out came Custer’s Last Jump, by Steven Utley and Waldrop, with a cover by the pre-Academy Award winning Shaun Tan.

Somewhere in the process of lugging boxes around I thought it was fun, so I asked Steven Utley if he’d be willing to let me do a collection of his work. Utley is a remarkable short fiction writer, a world-class master of the field, but sadly under-appreciated. I remember vividly writing at the top of a draft contents list: “Over 25 years of writing and it takes a 23 year-old punk in Australia to make his first collection”. I think it was much later that I told Steven how old I was when I approached him.

From there it kind of steamrolled, and I was able to publish the first collections by Simon Brown, Stephen Dedman and Sean Williams (Sean’s was his first full-length collection, having first been collected in a chapbook by Bill Congreve’s Mirrordanse in 1994).

I took a few years off from books at the start of the last decade, working at webzines, moving house about 30 times, doing other stuff. In 2005 I was invited to be a guest at the 2007 SwanCon, and felt a little embarrassed I hadn’t done enough to deserve this. Something snapped in my brain and I was soon talking to writers about an anthology project, and before I knew it I was on the phone asking Simon Brown for his collection of Iliad-themed stories, Troy.

Since then my wonderful, creative and especially tolerant partner Liz Grzyb has come on board and we’ve published a further 18 titles, including work by Terry Dowling, the late Sara Douglass, Kaaron Warren, Angela Slatter, Lucy Sussex, Lisa L Hannett, Justina Robson, Lewis Shiner, in addition to numerous anthologies and a Year’s Best Australian Fantasy & Horror anthology.

At the end of the day, editing for TP is still the full-time job I come home to after my daytime full-time job. This may change over the next 5 years, but has certainly been the case for the last 16.

What is the most important aspect of your editing role?

RF: Everything. I have control-freak, perfectionist tendencies, and so for me every stage of the process is important. It’s important to get the writers onside early and keep them onside, as a happy, satisfied writer is essential to the whole process, including in marketing. The book – the product, if you will – has to look good. I picked up early from the Eidolon crew that if indie press isn’t going to be able to compete with large press for price, it can and should be competitive when it comes to quality. Good covers, good paper stock, attention to detail with what goes on every page, you will rarely find a widow or an orphan in a Ticonderoga book (there are occasional pages that refuse to comply but these are well and truly the exception). The contents have to stack up, each story should be able to justify its inclusion. Talking to readers is important, finding out what they liked and didn’t like.

Which areas of editing to you find the most enjoyable?

I guess I’m happiest when I’m bringing the whole package together, when the cover art is falling into place, the look and feel of the book is coming together, the stories are almost finished, I’ve got a happy writer I can bounce ideas around with, I’ve got Liz looking over my shoulder spotting what I’ve missed, when I can see the virtual product in my mind. At this point the book never gets better, it’s my happy place.

At this point, I can usually reflect happily (or at least with a smile) everything that has led to now. I can bring together what I’ve discussed with both the writer and with Liz, so I have an idea of what we’re all looking for. I want to produce something that the writer will be at the very least pleased with, if not somewhat stunned at the realisation that their words and thoughts are materialising into a solid form.

Once this point is passed, reality drifts back in, and things like deadlines start to reappear. And the finished book rarely totally realises my ideal, though they are getting closer. Seeing a stack of books together is as close as it gets – and that stack represents work, boxes to shift, books to pack and post, stock to track, and so on.

In your view can editing be taught?

RF: I don’t know. I certainly believe that it is a learned skill, but from my experience it does require a certain predisposition to loving books and language. I think I’m not the best person to be teaching editing, as I find a lot of what I now do is more intuitive and I’m not always great at communication intuitions.

I certainly don’t believe that doing a course and getting a certificate at the end of it makes a person an editor. Much of the process involves learning on the job, learning from mistakes, developing as a person.

How do you define the editing role?

RF: I think as an editor/publisher at an indie press with a total staff of 2 part-timers, there isn’t the luxury of strictly defining roles. I’m not really strongly in favour of trying to do this – if a box of books needs taking to the post office they won’t move themselves. No job is below me and no job is above me.

I think even in a larger organisation, editors should take a wide view of their role, something like whatever needs to be done in order to get books out of writers’ heads and into the hands of readers.

What do you look for when employing an editor or working with an editor?

RF: I’m not the best at playing with others, so am yet to really find the ideal mix for someone to collaborate with as an equal on a project.

When I’m looking for editors to take on projects for TP, I’m looking for people I respect – to the point of being able to have a respectful heated discussion if necessary. I like to work with editors who have ideas, drive, enthusiasm and a good knowledge of the genre. I’m happy to work with someone who may not have a great deal of editing experience if they have a passion for and knowledge of the genre. I think I’m good at this as we’ve managed to bring on board some fantastic editors – Liz Grzyb, Talie Helene and Amanda Pillar.

What areas of editing do you find most challenging?

RF: I think the biggest challenge is growth. We started small, a couple of books in a big year, and records of almost everything could be kept in my head with the help of a couple of spreadsheets, a diary and a couple of napkins. Now I’m looking at whether to upgrade to specialist publishing accounting software to keep track of royalties on 8 titles per year, dealing with transactions in 3 currencies, or if our current systems are suitable. Finding the time to investigate these things takes time and focus.

At the same time I’m thinking if I should be buying books that won’t see print until 2014 (even with our 8/year schedule), balancing our titles across genres and formats, tracking review and other promo copies, getting books into the hands of the right advocates.

Growth also brings the challenge of making every writer know that we love and respect their work, the love to share does grow accordingly but I’d like to make sure that we continue this. No one writer is less special to us than any other when it comes to getting our books out and noticed, or when it comes to treating all writers in a respectful and professional manner. I hope we succeed at this.

What do you find rewarding about editing?

RF: Seeing a row of the same book, spines out. I think some books only become real at that stage, and I do put a lot of effort into our spines. Having a writer tell me that I’ve somehow contributed to their creative process, making their work better through my input. Having a reader tell me that they’ve enjoyed a TP book, or seeing someone recommend a TP book to one of their friends. Getting a cover design right. The little creative touches I’m able to add to books. The feeling I get from writers trusting me with their ideas and visions. Putting a book in the post is a wonderful grounding experience, knowing that at the other end is someone who has chosen to buy a book I’ve been involved in putting together (there are probably only a select few who buy a book because of my involvement – a handful who seem to trust my taste regardless of wherever it takes TP – but for all the others I just feel privileged to have been part of the process).

Books are a reward, ebooks included. Each book is a little package of a writer’s ideas, visions, thoughts and feelings, broadly or narrowly filtered through an editor, and then wrapped up in a form that should be pleasing to all interested parties. I’m involved in bringing incredible talent and creativity into the world. I like that.

Do you have any advice to aspiring editors?

RF: Love books. Love words.

For new entrants to the market, where is a good place to start in the editing field?

RF: I guess work out what you’re good at and what you want to do, and look for suitable roles accordingly. Don’t start an indie press, really, don’t. Cat Sparks is probably the only editor in Australia who started that way and now makes a living from working with books (as separate from writing), and she does that with 2 different editing jobs. There are a number of reasons why someone would want to start an indie press (wanting to dispose of an embarrassing fortune, certifiable insanity, a pathological love of books, a dislike of relaxing and doing nothing, the inability not to do it), but wanting to gain a foothold in the industry isn’t one of them.

I think the most important thing is the love of books and the desire to get books into the hands of readers. If you have that, then pursue this wherever it takes you.

First a little about you Laurie.

I’m the Submissions Editor at Black Library, based in Nottingham, UK. We’re the publishing arm of Games Workshop, so we deal exclusively with science fiction and fantasy stories based on the Warhammer gaming backgrounds. In the past, BL was more diverse (with general sci-fi and thrillers being released on the Solaris label, etc) but that was a little before my time here.

I asked Laurie for a photo so that you can track him down at Gamesday.

Thoughtful Laurie

I’ve been with the company since January, although I did a lot of freelance work for them for many years before that so I knew most of the authors and editors on a social level, as well as professionally. I had also been organising online fan-fiction contests in my spare time and releasing PDF anthologies of the submitted stories, just for fun.

From an early age, I was always fascinated by language and the written word–I upset my primary school teachers by finishing their reading scheme at the age of six, and having to bring my own books with me to school. I read ‘Lord of the Rings’ aged eight, primarily because my mum bet me £10 that I couldn’t. In hindsight, I think that appealing to my immature, mercenary nature was probably quite a shrewd move on her part. That’s the dangerous thing about having parents who are teachers: you never know when you’re being tricked into learning something.

My role is actually focused on discovering new authors, and either working with them on new projects or helping them to refine their style to fit with Black Library’s range–to use a music industry term, I’m the A&R man! We have a very peculiar readership (dare I say, fanbase?) in that almost every BL reader also seems to want to have a go at writing for us, too. We actively encourage this by having an annual ‘submissions window’ where we accept amateur writing samples and project pitches, and I’m trying to arrange more workshops and seminars at our events so that people know what sort of things we look for in prospective authors.

Why did you become an editor?
I actually became an “editor” long before I started working in publishing, although not in the sense you’d expect–for seven years I ran an audio-visual production company, so I was in fact a film editor and sound engineer. I like to think that the skills involved in editing, in any medium, are transferable at some level. Hollywood film editor Walter Murch famously said that editing takes ‘a certain kind of personality’ where you have to help craft ideas and refine other people’s work; both on a small scene-by-scene scale, but also in the wider context of the whole piece, the genre, the culture etc.

In short, I became an editor because I have that kind of personality. I’m opinionated, I’m a compulsive fact-checker, I like to have structures and procedures in place that I can follow and amend…but I also love to get involved at the creative level. Inside every editor is also usually a frustrated writer, but while I dabble in a lot of artistic fields I like to think that I work best in helping to refine the work of others.

What is the most important aspect of your editing role?
Well, for editing as a technical or artistic skill, it’s diligence and a keen eye for detail, or the ability to help craft ideas towards a goal. That goal depends on what you are editing, and why–it can be as crass as ‘to create a product which will sell to our customers’, or it can be to help an author craft something truly special, something that is an absolute pleasure to read. Usually, my goals fall somewhere in between… although as a lifelong fan of the science fiction and fantasy genres, I often edge towards the latter even when I perhaps shouldn’t…

But if we’re talking about my role as Submissions Editor, it’s actually far more important to create and maintain good working relationships with our authors. As I said before, I knew a lot of the guys before I started working in-house for Black Library, but I have also discovered a few new authors in the last eleven months or so, and so I’ve been able to build rapport with them right from the start of their careers with us.

Certainly, there have been times when my editorial style clashes with a writer’s personality, and I’ve gracefully handed these chaps over to other editors on my team–there’s no point in trying to force it, when what we really want to do is collaborate with them on great fiction. If an editor loses interest in an author’s work, or if the author feels they aren’t getting anywhere with that particular editor, then it’s time for a rethink.

Which areas of editing to you find the most enjoyable?
I love seeing a project through, from commissioning right up to the finished, published story. Although the publishing industry often moves at a near-glacial pace, I’ve already got some work from my authors in print even though I’ve only been here for eleven months. Without fail, even though I helped them thrash out the synopsis and refine the prose, guide them through rewrites and sort out the proofing copies…I still always read the finished, printed book. There’s a degree of finality in holding that novel in your hands, and I still get excited by that ‘new book smell’, especially when I know that I helped bring it into being.

In your view can editing be taught?
I think the basic skills of copy-editing and proofreading can be taught, but not so much the personal side of things. You can’t force someone to be creative, diplomatic and amiable but still to remain critical. If they don’t have the basis of that within them already, then they won’t be able to learn it. It’s about being a ‘people person’, or at least being extrovert enough to interact with others in a productive way.

Having said that, I often ask my editorial colleagues to check my responses before I send them back to authors–I have a tendency to be overly factual, which can sometimes sound officious or curt on paper. I find written feedback the hardest to give, which is strange really. My senior editor is Nick Kyme, who is also a successful author himself, and he has really helped me to find a suitable ‘vocabulary’ when dealing with my own authors: even if the message is harsh or very critical, it’s important to find a constructive way to deliver it, and to be direct without bruising egos along the way. As with anything, it’s an ongoing process, but once you find your rapport with an author you can sometimes get away with being a bit more direct or cheeky.

Something which Nick said to me very early on, which has always stayed with me in this role, is to ask yourself this: ‘Does it matter? And is it cool?’ (Believe it or not, I’ve got those words taped to my computer monitor so I always remember them!) This piece of advice came from me over-analysing author submissions, and picking fault with storylines or even character names. Especially working in the genres that we do, I had to constantly remind myself that there weren’t really any ‘facts’ as such, and that as long as something was AWESOME, it didn’t matter if it was actually possible or not. It illustrates my point perfectly – it’s important to learn the skills you need, but to constantly develop your own attitudes and the way you interact with your authors.

Do you have any advice to aspiring editors?
Aside from needing the obvious fastidious personality and attention to literary detail, you mean? An editor not only needs to know the difference between there, their and they’re, but also needs to be able to communicate those sort of facts to others in a helpful and diplomatic way. It’s fine to check your facts–I always have dictionary.com and Wikipedia open on my desktop, for first-stage research and basic fact-checking–but a good grounding in the English language and an academic spirit are invaluable.

It’s also very important to consume as much literature and media as you can. It’s good to have examples of tone, imagery and style that you can pitch as ideas or to help develop an author’s work, but it’s also vitally important so that your author doesn’t accidently “borrow” the plot of an old episode of some TV program, and you unknowingly approve and commission it!

As with most careers in this age of devalued university degrees, in order to get a foot in the door you’re going to need some experience in the field. For me, this was doing freelance video and literary editing on contract for Games Workshop, and it allowed me to get to know people in the industry, and specifically the company I wanted to work for. When there was no role available, I honed my skills by running the aforementioned online fiction contests and acting as an editor there.

Although everyone on the BL editorial team happens to come from an academic background (degrees, masters, post-graduate study, foundation courses etc) this is not necessarily required to be good at the job. For example, I have a BA in Cultural Media and Film Theory, and a BSc in Digital Post-production Technologies, and I have also studied English Language and Linguistics…but none of that directly relates to editing or the role itself. A professional qualification in publishing would be far more valuable to someone looking to get started in the industry, and that would still be secondary to actual experience.

The Black Library can be found here

Here is a scary shot of Laurie, which is probably why he signs his emails (Pedantic Corrections Goblin).

Scary Laurie